NRF to Reject ‘One-Sided’ Credit Card Swipe Fee Settlement
WASHINGTON,
May 21, 2013 – The National Retail Federation announced today that it
will formally oppose a proposed settlement of a federal antitrust
lawsuit over credit card swipe fees
charged by Visa and MasterCard, and urged retailers to carefully
consider their own decisions before next week’s deadline set by the
court.
“The proposed settlement does nothing to bring swipe fees
under control and would give Visa and MasterCard a legal blessing to
continue their abuse of merchants and consumers indefinitely,” NRF
Senior Vice President and General Counsel Mallory Duncan
said. “No settlement at all would be better than this one-sided
‘agreement’ written by the card companies for the card companies that
would tie retailers’ hands for decades to come.”
While many
retailers have already filed paperwork with the U.S. District Court in
Brooklyn, N.Y., opposing the settlement, many small retailers have yet
to act because they lack the legal expertise and resources to fully
assess the complicated proposal. Retailers who oppose the plan have
until May 28 to say whether they will opt out of the money offered and
accompanying restrictions on future legal action, object to proposed
injunctive relief that comes with additional restrictions, or – as NRF
plans – do both. Under the class action terms of the proposed agreement,
retailers who do not opt out by the deadline will automatically be
considered to have accepted the settlement and will give up the right to
file future lawsuits over the fees and other restrictive rules.
NRF
opposes the settlement because it fails to reform the price-fixing
system under which Visa and MasterCard set the schedule of swipe fees
followed by the thousands of banks that issue their credit cards, or to
introduce transparency that would lead to competition to lower the fees.
Rather than lowering the fees, the card companies have proposed that
the fees be passed along to consumers in the form of a surcharge, even
though most major retailers have rejected surcharges as the opposite of
what they have sought during the years-long fight over swipe fees.
Retailers
who do not opt out – and thereby become fully bound by the restrictions
of the agreement – will be eligible for a share of $7.25 billion. But
the figure amounts to less than three months’ worth of swipe fee
charges, and the small retailers hit hardest by the fees would give up
their rights for as little as a few hundred dollars.
The suit was
brought in 2005 by 19 trade associations and individual retail
companies, but a majority – including all six trade associations –
rejected the settlement when it was proposed last summer. NRF, like most
retailers, is not a party to the lawsuit, but has led the retail
industry’s opposition to the settlement because NRF member companies
would be dragged into its terms as part of the class action.
Averaging
about 2 percent, swipe fees are a percentage of the transaction taken
by banks each time a consumer swipes a credit card to pay for a
purchase, and total about $30 billion a year nationwide. The fees have
tripled over the past decade, and drive prices up for the average
household by more than $250 per year.
As the world’s largest
retail trade association and the voice of retail worldwide, NRF
represents retailers of all types and sizes, including chain restaurants
and industry partners, from the United States and more than 45
countries abroad. Retailers operate more than 3.6 million U.S.
establishments that support one in four U.S. jobs – 42 million working
Americans. Contributing $2.5 trillion to annual GDP, retail is a daily
barometer for the nation’s economy. NRF’s This is Retail
campaign highlights the industry’s opportunities for life-long careers,
how retailers strengthen communities at home and abroad, and the
critical role that retail plays in driving innovation. www.nrf.com
Contact: J. Craig Shearman / (202) 626-8134 / shearmanc@nrf.com
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire