(Reuters)
- A trans-Atlantic divide between European and U.S. retailers over how
best to respond to fatal disasters in Bangladesh textile factories split
wide open on Wednesday, with U.S. retailers claiming their European
counterparts are giving labour unions too much control over ensuring
workplace safety.
Some U.S. retailers, including Gap Inc, had said
they would not join the European pact without changes to the way
conflicts are resolved in the courts. The rhetoric sharpened
considerably when a U.S. trade group, the National Retail Federation, after calls with member companies and other groups, issued a stinging rebuke of the European-led safety accord.
The U.S. solidarity did show one high-profile
crack late Wednesday when Abercrombie & Fitch Co announced it had
verbally agreed to join the accord.
"We
are committed to Bangladesh and support industry-wide efforts to
improve safety standards," Abercrombie's director of sustainability, Kim
Harr, said in a statement. "We believe this is the right thing to do to
bring about sustainable, effective change."
The
accord came together last week in the aftermath of the April 24
collapse of Rana Plaza in Savar, near Dhaka, the second high-profile
disaster at a Bangladeshi textile centre in recent months. The death
toll at Rana Plaza stood at 1,127 this week, making it the deadliest
industrial accident since the 1984 Bhopal disaster in India.
Earlier this week, apparel company PVH Corp, marketer of the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands, became the first U.S. company to join the accord.
Even so, the U.S. retail and apparel
industry remained nearly unanimous in criticizing the compact. Matthew
Shay, chief executive of the National Retail Federation, in a statement
Wednesday said the accord, hammered out in recent weeks under leadership
of IndustriALL, a union organization based in Europe, "veers away from
commonsense solutions and seeks to advance a narrow agenda driven by
special interests."
He said it
"exposes American companies to a legally questionable binding
arbitration provision, a process that serves only the unions, not the
workers they represent."
Wal-Mart
Stores Inc, the world's largest retailer, on Tuesday had preempted the
U.S. industry rejection of the European initiative by stating that it
intended to work on its own. Wal-Mart said it will implement a
stepped-up plan to improve working conditions in Bangladesh factories it
employs.
Gap this week became the
first of several U.S. retailers to say they would not join the European
pact without changes to the way conflicts are resolved in the courts.
The accord drew sharp criticism from a major U.S. retail trade group for
not calling for equal responsibility from the Bangladeshi government
and factory workers.
IndustriALL said the accord could not be amended to address concerns of U.S. companies.
"The
clear message is that the legally binding nature of the accord is what
makes it a historic game changer and watering that down is absolutely
out of the question," IndustriALL spokesman Tom Grinter said.
Signatories to the accord included the world's two biggest fashion
retailers, Inditex, owner of the Zara chain, and H&M, as well as
British department store operator John Lewis and Arcadia Group, whose
chains include Topshop.
The accord
calls for binding arbitration that would be enforceable in the courts
of the country where a company is domiciled, according to the text of
the agreement that was released on Wednesday. Binding arbitration
typically restricts the ability of the parties involved to appeal any
decision in court.
In addition,
companies must fund activities of a steering committee, safety inspector
and training coordinator, contributing up to $500,000 per year for each
of the five years of the agreement.
The
National Retail Federation, the U.S. trade group, criticized the
funding component for not providing for accountability for how funds are
spent.
IndustriALL had set
Wednesday as the deadline for retailers to sign on to the
fire-and-building safety agreement framed out initially by union and
non-governmental groups. proposed by the European groups. Almost 30
garment and retail brands sourcing from Bangladesh had signed ahead of
the deadline.
A group of five North
American retail trade associations and companies had sought to draft
their own proposals in recent days. The NRF said a proposal has
circulated, but no retailer had signed it yet.
Jonathan
Gold, an official with the NRF, said the North American proposal takes
into account other stakeholders like the Bangladeshi government and
factory owners, as well as the brands and retailers.
Retailers
"are afraid what will happen if there was some kind of arbitration
ruling and how it's going to come back to them," he said.
The chief executive of the trade group American Apparel & Footwear
Association, Kevin Burke, on Wednesday said he met with several
Bangladesh government officials, including the foreign minister and the
Bangladesh ambassador to the United States as they "begin high-level
discussions with all apparel industry stakeholders."
WAL-MART'S APPROACH
The
North American and European companies that rely on Bangladesh for
inexpensive apparel are still split on how best to ensure safe working
conditions. Wal-Mart's approach, while potentially faster, touches only a
fraction of Bangladesh's estimated 6,500 garment factories. The
European-led approach covers a wider spectrum.
Wal-Mart said it has begun checking the 279 factories that supply its stores, and plans to inspect them all within six months.
A
union official who helped draft the European accord, Philip Jennings,
head of Swiss-based UNI Global Union, on Wednesday said in a statement
that Wal-Mart was "acting as the pirates of the supply chain" and called
its alternative solution "meaningless."
In
Chittagong, about 250 kilometres (155 miles) from Dhaka, workers at one
factory that Wal-Mart wants closed said they were unaware of any safety
concerns.
"We don't know about
the problems of our owners. We don't know about the risk of building. We
are working for our livelihood. If we stop the work, we cannot
survive," one of the workers, Parvin Akter, said.
Even
so, there were signs of change. In Dhaka, the government has inspected
and closed more than a dozen garment factories in recent weeks because
of structural problems.
Some
workers remain sceptical. Mominur Rahman, who damaged his spine jumping
from the third floor to escape the deadly Tazreen fire last year, said
working conditions remain tough.
"The
factory inspection system in Bangladesh needs to be increased and
improved," he said through an interpreter at a workplace safety
conference in Thailand
last week. "I never saw a factory inspection at the Tazreen factory,
not once. Same with the Savar tragedy, nothing will change immediately."
(Additional
reporting by Nazimuddin Shyamol in Chittagong, Nivedita Bhattacharjee
in Chicago, Emma Thomasson in Zurich and Amy Sawitta Lefevre in Bangkok;
Writing by Emily Kaiser; Editing by Michael Perry, Maureen Bavdek and
Leslie Adler)
By Reuters
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire